설정을 저장하고 실패에서 돌아오기
Settings With Explicit Save
Edit and save preferences without losing later input or leaving with unsaved work.
이 자료로 구현하기
원문 주소와 버전이 포함된 요청문입니다. 복사한 뒤 만들 화면과 요구사항을 채워 에이전트에게 전달하세요.
FROM PRINCIPLE TO PRACTICE
이 원리로 만든 예제 1
예제를 열어 직접 조작하고, 관찰한 동작을 이 문서의 원리와 비교해 보세요.
저장 스냅샷·중복 제출·나가기Save ownership
- 저장 작업의 소유권과 응답 순서
초안·기준값·요청 스냅샷·이동 결정을 함께 조작합니다. 원격 서버는 수동 응답으로 시뮬레이션합니다.
- 저장 작업의 소유권과 응답 순서
Repository Boundary
Edit and save preferences without losing later input or leaving with unsaved work. This is a consumer interaction composition in Design Engineering. Spatial structure comes from SaaS Settings; this recipe adds no reusable Layout behavior.
Reusable Method
Selected Pattern Stack
draft/baseline, submitted snapshot, single flight, unsaved navigation.
Ownership And Event Flow
The form owns draft; the server owns persisted data; the save attempt owns the snapshot; the router owns pending departure. Dirty is derived. Account changes invalidate the entire form generation.
Edit → validate → capture snapshot → save → reconcile acknowledgement → re-evaluate dirty. For Save-and-leave, leave only after successful reconciliation and only if no newer edits remain.
Composition And Substitution
Explicit-save semantics require the snapshot and draft separation. A single-flight guard can share or ignore repeats; queuing requires a separately defined sequence of snapshots. Immediate autosave is a different recipe with debounce, ordering, and conflict rules.
Acceptance Sequences
| Sequence | Expected outcome |
|---|---|
| Submit A, edit B, acknowledge A | Baseline A; draft B remains dirty; stay if leaving was requested |
| Save fails, then retry | Preserve draft and release the operation guard |
| Remote revision conflict | Preserve draft; offer reload/merge under consumer policy |
| Cancel departure | Keep draft and return focus to the invoker |
Opinionated Guidance
Keep the ownership boundaries visible when composing the patterns. One screen can combine these mechanisms without making every value global. Record the rejected alternative and its user-visible cost in the state brief.
Platform-Specific Guidance
The form must connect errors to fields and announce completion without implying newer edits were saved. A disabled submit control is not the duplicate guard.
Unsupported Absolutes
These acceptance sequences are proposed integration checks, not captured product evidence. Pattern model tests do not prove this entire screen, its backend, or its focus behavior.
Verification Contract
Adapt every acceptance row to the consumer and record actual results with the verification matrix. Include the ordinary successful task and at least one interrupted task. The initial handoff is consumer_reference: not_applicable because this fictional recipe selects no consumer profile or conformance record.
Source, License, And Attribution
Locally authored synthesis and examples. No upstream implementation is copied. These experimental contracts describe consumer-owned behavior; review when a failure, ownership change, or platform change invalidates an assumption.
IA Navigation
Parent: State Management. Next: Continue the state management route.


